Archive for the ‘1997’ Category

book “Hostile Waters”

Friday, January 2nd, 2009

From Wed Oct 29 09:57:05 1997
>Date: Wed, 29 Oct 1997 08:54:33 -0800
>From: Mike Potter
>Organization: Artecon, Inc.
>X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01Gold (WinNT; I)
>To: mahan@microworks.net
>Subject: Re: book “Hostile Waters”
>Precendence: bulk
>Sender: mahan-owner@microworks.net
>Reply-To: mahan@microworks.net
>
> > A few weeks ago there was a statement in the news, issued by an
> > admiral, denouncing the book … Anyone have that admiral’s name?
> > Anyone have the details of his statement?
>
>Bill, this might refer to the review in October 1997 USNI Proceedings.
>
>–
>Michael C Potter Capt SC USNR mike.potter@artecon.com
>CO VTU 1911G, NavMarCoResCen | | W: 760-431-4465
>9955 Pomerado Rd, San Diego CA -|- _|_ H: 619-578-6383
>Mail: PO Box 452130 >_|__( |/_>San Diego CA 92145-2130 >_III_ ||/ _III_ |/|_o
> =-| L/_| _|____L_/_|==
> ___ ________|____-===L|_LL| -==| .___ |
> ___. __I____|_[_]_______|_____[__||____[_]_|__|_=====_|\__–+====–/
>\_____/|_|__| == 963 /
>|

Posted via email from mahan’s posterous

Thanks

Friday, January 2nd, 2009

From Thu Oct 30 06:57:45 1997
>Date: Thu, 30 Oct 1997 14:14:13 +0200
>To: mahan@microwrks.com, wwii-l@listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu, >marhst-l@post.queensu.ca
>Subject: Thanks
>X-Mailer: T-Online eMail 2.0
>X-Sender: 0611603955-0001@t-online.de (Silvia Lanzendoerfer)
>From: BWV_WIESBADEN@t-online.de (Tim Lanzendoerfer)
>Precendence: bulk
>Sender: mahan-owner@microworks.net
>Reply-To: mahan@microworks.net
>
>All who helped with the BB-38 request, thanks for your help.
>
>Tim
>
>Tim Lanzendoerfer | “I have just taken on a great
>Amateur Naval Historian | responsibility. I will do my
>Email: BWV_Wiesbaden@t-online.de | utmost to meet it” – Nimitz
>—————————————————————–
> The United States Navy in the Pacific War 1941 – 1945
> http://www.microworks.net/pacific
> The ships, the men, the battles
>—————————————————————–

Posted via email from mahan’s posterous

World Maritime News – 24 Oct., 1997 – excerpts

Friday, January 2nd, 2009

From Thu Oct 30 15:35:08 1997
>Date: Thu, 30 Oct 1997 14:33:12 -0800
>From: Mike Potter
>Organization: Artecon, Inc.
>X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01Gold (WinNT; I)
>To: mahan@microworks.net
>Subject: World Maritime News – 24 Oct., 1997 – excerpts
>Precendence: bulk
>Sender: mahan-owner@microworks.net
>Reply-To: mahan@microworks.net
>
>World Maritime News – 24 Oct., 1997
>———————————–
>
>Kvaerner to build ships at former Philadelphia Naval Shipyard
>
> On 21 Oct., Kvaerner A.S.A. signed a memorandum under which it
>agreed in principle to build and operate a shipbuilding facility at the
>former Philadelphia Naval Shipyard. It would be named Kvaerner
>Philadelphia Shipyard. Details still need to be negotiated before a
>formal contract is made. The agreement included public investment of
>U.S.$399 million including U.S.$182 from Pennsylvania for renovating the
>yard, U.S.$65 million from the Delaware River Port Authority, U.S.$49
>million from Philadelphia and U.S.$50 million in federal funding. The
>state and city will also loan Kvaerner U.S.$30 million at a favorable
>interest rate. The shipyard will be publicly owned and operated by
>Kvaerner under a 99-year deal. In addition, CSX Corp. and Norfolk
>Southern Corp. are creating a U.S.$75 million economic development fund
>which will be coordinated by the office of Pennsylvania’s governor and
>the Pennsylvania Department of Community and Economic Development. Of
>this, U.S.$20 million will be spent on the shipyard. Kvaerner will
>invest U.S.$165 million over 15 years with U.S.$45 million in the first
>five; buy the first three containerships built at cost, likely U.S.$80
>million; guarantee minimum job levels of 700 people at the end of five
>years and at least 500 more 10 years after that; and relocate its North
>American headquarters to Philadelphia. The yard may build tankers and
>passenger ships as well and will build as many as nine ships in the
>first five years. Construction of the first ship is expected to begin in
>summer with completion in 2000. Kvaerner plans to use two dry docks on
>at least 36 hectares/90 acres.
>
>Sri Lanka Navy attack kills more than 100
>
> Sri Lanka Navy vessels attacked boats of the Liberation Tigers of
>Tamil Eelam on 19 Oct. off northeastern Sri Lanka, killing more than 100
>people. Seven boats were sunk in a five hour battle 272 kilometers/170
>miles northeast of the capital, Colombo.
>
>Engineer of vessel killed in pirate attack at Manila…
>
> Pirates attacked the Yi He (Chinese-registry 25,078-dwt
>containership built in 1968, operated by COSCO Container Lines) shortly
>after it arrived 17 Oct. at Manila, the Philippines. The engineer was
>killed when he fought back. The ship, with 30 crew, arrived from Hong
>Kong before dawn and anchored off the main harbor. Four pirates boarded
>from a motorboat.
>
>…Containership docked in Rio de Janeiro boarded by pirates
>
> Pirates with scuba gear and submachine guns boarded the Zim
>Montevideo (Antigua-registry 22,525-dwt containership built in 1994,
>operated by Hermann Buss GmbH & Cie.) on early 21 Oct. at Rio de
>Janeiro, Brazil. As many as 15 people in small craft used ropes to scale
>the hull of the ship as it was docked in Guanabara Bay. They reportedly
>stole electronic equipment from a container.
>
>Canadian warship commander relieved
>
> The commanding officer of the Canadian Maritime Command’s
>Halifax-class Frigate H.M.C.S. Calgary (FFH 335) was relieved of command
>18 Oct. Cmdr. Robert Bush, 42, is being investigated by two military
>officers. He assumed command of the ship in July 1996. On 22 Oct., Bush
>released a public letter in which he admitted drinking less than six
>hours before sailing the warship from Campbell River, British Columbia,
>at 0430 8 July. He apologized and said he would seek professional help.
>Regulations bar any crewmember from drinking alcohol within six hours of
>standing a watch. Bush is now serving in Esquimalt, British Columbia.
>
>Albanian People’s Navy vessel sunk in collision has been raised
>
> An Albanian People’s Navy vessel carrying Albanian migrants to
>Italy that capsized and sank 28 March in the Adriatic Sea has been
>raised and towed to Brindisi, Italy. About 83 people were killed and 34
>were rescued. Many of the survivors said that the ship sank after
>colliding with the Italian Navy Minerva-class Corvette Sibilla (F 558).
>The sunken vessel was reportedly stolen from Sarande, Albania, on 26
>March and then sailed to Vlore, Albania. Survivors said the vessel was
>deiberately rammed, once astern and once on a side. Italy said the
>vessel was evading Italian ships and sailed on a collision course. The
>commanding officer of the Italian ship, Maurizio Laudadio, was relieved
>of his duties 30 March. Eleven bodies have been removed.
>
>–

Posted via email from mahan’s posterous

Pollards ask Israel to take responsibility

Friday, January 2nd, 2009

From Thu Oct 30 15:58:40 1997
>Date: Thu, 30 Oct 1997 14:57:19 -0800
>From: Mike Potter
>Organization: Artecon, Inc.
>X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01Gold (WinNT; I)
>To: mahan@microworks.net
>Subject: Pollards ask Israel to take responsibility
>Precendence: bulk
>Sender: mahan-owner@microworks.net
>Reply-To: mahan@microworks.net
>
>[Suppose the Israeli government takes responsibility for Pollard’s
>actions: would they then find it easier also to take responsibility for
>attacking USS =Liberty= as a known US asset?]
>
>Convicted spy makes plea to Israel
>__________________________________________________________________________
> Copyright © 1997 Nando.net
> Copyright © 1997 The Associated Press
>
> JERUSALEM (October 29, 1997 08:22 a.m. EST http://www.nando.net) —
>Convicted spy Jonathan Pollard asked Israel’s Supreme Court on Wednesday
>to force the government to acknowledge him as its agent, taking
>responsibility for his espionage against America.
> Israeli leaders have maintained that Pollard, a former U.S. Navy
>intelligence analyst, passed secret U.S. military documents to Israel in
>the mid-1980s without official Israeli sanction.
> During Wednesday’s closed-door hearing, a three-judge panel ordered
>the government to grant Pollard’s wife meetings with senior security
>officials during the next two months, then return for another hearing.
> “The government seems to be beginning to realize that it’s got to
>deal with this,” Esther Pollard told reporters outside the court.
> Pollard’s lawyer, Larry Dub, said an Israeli acknowledgment that
>Pollard was an agent could clear the way for his client’s release.
>Pollard has served 13 years of a life term in a U.S. prison.
> “There is a price to be paid for the release of Jonathan Pollard,”
>Dub said. “The first installment on the price is the admission that
>Jonathan Pollard is an agent. The Americans are waiting for the Israelis
>to come clean, and to tell the truth.”
> President Clinton rejected a clemency plea by Pollard in 1996, citing
>the enormity of his crime, his lack of remorse and the damage he caused
>to U.S. security.
> Pollard has complained that Israel abandoned him, and that Israeli
>leaders, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, have done nothing
>to press for his release, despite many promises.
> He reiterated the complaints in tape-recorded telephone conversation
>that his wife played back for The Associated Press. In it, Pollard cited
>the prisoner releases with which Israel won the freedom of two Israeli
>agents captured after a bungled attack in Jordan last month.
> Israel “got them out in a couple of days, these guys, these two
>agents. They didn’t have to rot for years in a foreign prison,” Pollard
>said.
>
> AP-ES-10-29-97 0755EST

Posted via email from mahan’s posterous

I bet you wondered…

Friday, January 2nd, 2009

From Fri Oct 31 12:38:44 1997
>Date: Fri, 31 Oct 1997 20:04:29 +0200
>To: mahan@microwrks.com, wwii-l@listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu, >marhst-l@post.queensu.ca
>Subject: I bet you wondered…
>X-Mailer: T-Online eMail 2.0
>X-Sender: 0611603955-0001@t-online.de (Silvia Lanzendoerfer)
>From: BWV_WIESBADEN@t-online.de (Tim Lanzendoerfer)
>Precendence: bulk
>Sender: mahan-owner@microworks.net
>Reply-To: mahan@microworks.net
>
>…when I would come and ask stupid questions again. Well, here I am.
>I was putting some more research into the biographies, and encountered one
>rather strange command which I would like to know about. >Then-Rear-Admiral Jesse
>Bartlett Oldendorf was “Commander all Forces Aruba and Curacao”. Was >that an ASW
>job?
>Second…by chance does anybody know which ship RADM Clark commanded during
>Operation Torch?
>Third, since I will have little time to work on anything (any >private work), I
>could use some help. If anybody has the time and interest to write one or
>however many biographies (or anything else…basically, I’ll take it >all!), I’d
>be very grateful if he/she/it would contact me.
>Fourth (for the WWII-L), I ask you to pardon my off-topic post(s) of late. I
>promise to abstain from that in the future.
>
>Thanks,
>Tim
>
>Tim Lanzendoerfer | “I have just taken on a great
>Amateur Naval Historian | responsibility. I will do my
>Email: BWV_Wiesbaden@t-online.de | utmost to meet it” – Nimitz
>—————————————————————–
> The United States Navy in the Pacific War 1941 – 1945
> http://www.microworks.net/pacific
> The ships, the men, the battles
>—————————————————————–

Posted via email from mahan’s posterous

_U-505_ needs repairs

Friday, January 2nd, 2009

From Fri Oct 31 20:14:26 1997
>Date: Fri, 31 Oct 1997 22:14:35 -0600
>From: Brooks A Rowlett
>Organization: None whatsoever
>X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01-C-MACOS8 (Macintosh; I; PPC)
>To: “C. Patrick Hreachmack” ,
> Greg Dunn , Jon Parshall ,
> Mahan Naval History Mailing List ,
> MARHST ,
> World War II Discussion List ,
> SubWar list
>Subject: _U-505_ needs repairs
>Precendence: bulk
>Sender: mahan-owner@microworks.net
>Reply-To: mahan@microworks.net
>
>Accoprding to an article in the Chicago SUN-TIMES online, the _U-505_,
>at the Chicago Museum of Science and Industry is in need of repairs.
>Detail are in the article, at:
>
>http://www.suntimes.com:80/output/show1/lead30.htm

Posted via email from mahan’s posterous

Concrete ships in WWI

Friday, January 2nd, 2009

From Fri Oct 31 20:26:20 1997
>Date: Fri, 31 Oct 1997 22:27:03 -0600
>From: Brooks A Rowlett
>Organization: None whatsoever
>X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01-C-MACOS8 (Macintosh; I; PPC)
>To: Mahan Naval History Mailing List ,
> MARHST ,
> WWOne Mailing List
>Subject: Concrete ships in WWI
>Precendence: bulk
>Sender: mahan-owner@microworks.net
>Reply-To: mahan@microworks.net
>
>US built Cncrete ships in WWI: This topic, which comes up every once in
>a while, is covered in an article in the currently-on-stands issue of
>the (US) magazine SEA CLASSICS. December 1997, Vol 30 #12.
>
>SEA CLASSICS was not a very good magazine in the 1980’s, but I beleive
>it has had a rennaissance in the last few years. It is still ‘popular’
>rather than scholarly, but it is interesting and entertaining again.
>
>See
>http://www.challpubs.com/
>for ordering information, if not in a nearby store.
>
>There is also an article about the disappearance of the US Navy Collier
>CYCOPS during WWI. Other article cover WWII material, including visit
>of King George VI and Queen to US on liner EMPRESS OF AUSTRALIA with
>gold being transferred to US before WWII began; USS PGM-17 in WWII, and
>Americans who were involved 9sometimes as bystanders) in the hunt for
>the BISMARCK.

Posted via email from mahan’s posterous

KORMORAN v. SYDNEY – part 1

Friday, January 2nd, 2009

From Mon Sep 01 15:33:25 1997
>Date: Mon, 01 Sep 1997 18:32:32 EST
>From: EDWARD WITTENBERG
>To: MARHST-L@POST.QUEENSU.CA, MAHAN@MICROWRKS.COM,
> WWII-L@LISTSERV.ACSU.BUFFALO.EDU
>CC: wew@papa.uncp.edu
>Subject: KORMORAN v. SYDNEY – part 1
>Precendence: bulk
>Sender: mahan-owner@microworks.net
>
>TO ALL:
>
> I’ve been sitting around enjoying the Labor Day holiday without
>much to do. I was reading Detmers’ _The Raider Kormoran_ when I
>remembered that a few weeks ago a post concerning her had crossed my
>screen. I think that it was on either MARHST or MAHAN, but I’m not sure.
>Regardless, I decided that instead of sitting around watching mind-numbing
>programs on the TV, I would devote myself to something more constructive.
>Therefore, I have transcribed the chapter in Detmers’ work describing the
>engagement with the H.M.A.S. Sydney. Detmers’ work was originally
>published in 1959, so I would like to ask our Australian members if there
>have been any efforts to locate the final resting place of the Sydney? As
>I recall, there was mention of some type of ongoing research in the posts
>that I saw. Thanks.
>
>Edward Wittenberg
>wew@papa.uncp.edu
>
>
> The raider Kormoran (ex-Steiermark) was commanded by Lieutenant-Commander
> Theodor Detmers. The largest of the German raiders, the Kormoran weighed
> in at 8,736 tons. Her overall length was 515 feet, she had a beam of 66
> feet, and a draft of 30 feet. She had a maximum speed of 18 knots. She
> was armed with six 5.9-inch guns, two twin 37mm, five 20mm cannon, four
> twin 21-inch torpedo tubes (mounted above the waterline), two single
> 21-inch torpedo tubes (mounted below the waterline), 420 mines, and one
> mine-laying motor launch, in addition to two Arado 196 scouting aircraft.
> Her complement was 397, although this varied considerably due to prize
> crews and new drafts. Operating in the South Atlantic, Indian Ocean, and
> the South Pacific, Kormoran sank eleven ships (Antonis, British Union,
> Afric Star, Eurylochus, Agnita Canadolite, Craftsman, Nicolaos D.L.
> Velebit, Mareeba, and Stamatios G. Embiricos) for a total of 68,274 tons.
> She stayed at sea from 12-3-40 to 11-19-41 (352 days). Her cruise ended
> when she encountered the Australian light cruiser Sydney. Lured into
> range of Kormoran’s guns, the Sydney was lost with no survivors. However,
> she did enough damage to the Kormoran to ensure that the raider could not
> stay afloat. Eventually, Detmers and approximately 320 of his crew were
> rescued and spent the remainder of the war in Australian prison-of-war
> camps.
>
>(Source: German Raiders of World War II by August Karl Muggenthaler.
>Published by Prentice-Hall, Inc. Englewood Cliffs N.J., 1977).
>
>
>The following excerpt is taken from _The Raider Kormoran_ by Theodor
>Detmers (London: Tandem Publishing Ltd, 1975. Edward Fitzgerald, trans).
>
>
>H.M.A.S. Sydney
>
>
> It was November 19, 1941, a beautiful day with warm sunshine. As
> so often in the Indian Ocean the visibility was perfect. The wind was
> south-south-east, and had dropped to between Force 3 and 4. The sea
> had dropped too, and more or less the only movement was a medium
> swell from the south-west. The Kormoran was proceeding at medium
> speed on her usual sweep and gradually approaching Shark’s Bay from
> the south-west.
>
> At 15.00 hours I checked the ship’s course and decided to carry
> on without change until 20.00 hours, and then turn eastwards towards
> Shark’s Bay. After the usual look round in all directions I went into
> the mess for some coffee.
>
> At 15.55 hours the alarm bells began to ring, and a moment or two
> later an orderly arrived to tell me that a ship had been sighted ahead,
> probably a sailing vessel.
>
> When I got to the bridge I saw a small light spot almost dead ahead.
> The look-out in the foretop was revising his signals all the time,
> because in the shimmering light at the limit of visibility the contours
> changed continually. Before long we could see two sailing ships, then
> a number of vessels, and behind them two clouds of smoke which probably
> came from an escort. I didn’t much care for the outlook, so I turned
> away to port at 260 degrees and ordered full speed ahead. Then I went
> on the signal deck and looked through the sighting telescope of the
> gunnery control point. At first the air was quivering so in the heat t
> hat it was difficult to see anything clearly, but then a typical
> cruiser shape began to come clear. It was one of the three Australian
> cruisers of the ‘Perth’ class, the fellows I had seen in Sydney Harbour
> when the cruiser Koln visited there in 1933. It was exactly 16.00
> hours now.
>
> At that time the Australian Navy consisted of two heavy cruisers,
> the Australia and Canberra, three light cruisers, the Sydney, the Perth,
> and the Hobart, and an older and smaller cruiser, the Adelaide. In
> addition there were the usual destroyer flotillas and a variety of
> smaller craft. The two heavy cruisers were of the ‘Berwick’ class like
> the Cornwall, of 10,000 tons displacement and armed with eight 8-inch
> guns as their main armament. The light cruisers were of about 7,000
> tons displacement and were armed with eight 6-inch guns as their main
> armament. The Adelaide had a displacement of 5,100 tons and her speed
> was 25 1/2 knots compared with the 32 1/2 of the other three light
> cruisers. In addition to their 6-inch guns the cruisers of the ‘Perth’
> class had eight 4-inch anti-aircraft guns, four 2-inch anti-aircraft
> guns, twelve heavy machine guns, eight torpedo tube and two
> reconnaissance planes. One of these fellows was coming up now.
>
> Evasion was out of the question. There were three hours until
> dusk at 19.00 hours, but the cruiser coming up could move at 32 1/2
> knots compared with our best speed of 18 knots, which we were unable
> to do anymore on account of the barnacles and so on clinging to our
> bottom and sides. About the best we could manage was 16 1/2 knots,
> approximately half of the enemy’s speed. And even if, against all
> likelihood, I managed to hold he at arm’s length until dusk that
> wouldn’t help me much either because the nights in these parts were
> light, with good visibility, which meant that now he had sighted me he
> would not loose me again so easily. No, the only thing to do was to
> keep my course and wait and see what happened; remaining alert all
> the time to take advantage of any mistakes he might make and see to it
> at least that I had a favourable opening position.
>
> My one aim was thus to gain time; time in which the enemy
> cruiser would come closer, if possible to within six or eight thousand
> yards or so, so that when the shooting started he would not be able
> to outrange me or to withdraw to ten thousand yards and more. If I
> could get him near enough my battery of six 15 cm. guns would not be
> so very inferior to his eight 6-inch, because the advantage of modern
> fire- control, which he possessed, would not mean so much at short
> distances; and for all their simple, even rudimentary fire-direction
> and control, my guns would be capable of shooting it out even with
> his modern double turrets.
>
> Of course, this didn’t take into consideration the fact the we
> were, after all, only a refitted passenger ship with thin hull plates
> – and that we had 420 mines on board, which we certainly couldn’t get
> rid of now in sight of the enemy.
>
> We increased speed now and I dropped my foretop lookout and
> lowered the crow’s nest in order not to awaken suspicion. I also
> turned to 250 degrees and took up the most favourable shooting position
> available to me. I paid no further heed to the position of the sun,
> because the smoke sent up by the simultaneous performance of all our
> engines was so visible that the enemy must have seen us, even if his
> crow’s nest were not manned. We now waited for the first sign that he
> had, in fact, sighted us.
>
> Then at 16.05 came a report to me on the bridge that motor
> No. 4 was out of action. Our top speed was about fourteen knots and
> this I now sailed. The cruiser then turned towards us blinking
> ‘N.N.J.’. My Chief Signalman looked at me and shrugged his shoulders.
> Neither of us knew what this odd group of letters was supposed to mean,
> or how we were expected to answer it. As the cruiser was not far away
> now I did nothing; let him do something – something wrong, I hope.
> For a while he continued to morse ‘N.N.J.’, and then suddenly he
> demanded ‘What ship?’
>
> This cheered up my Chief Signalman and his colleagues no end. At
> last the big fellow had asked something sensible, and he now hurried
> to me to know whether he should reply with our searchlight or top lamp.
> My reply astonished him for a moment.
>
> ‘Neither,’ I said. ‘Answer slowly and awkwardly like a real
> merchant-navy greenhorn – and with flag wagging. In the meantime
> they’ll come even closer.’
>
> Morse signals would have speeded up the proceedings too much
> for me. I knew I had to fight him and I wanted him as close as
> possible to nullify all or most of his advantages; to gain time for
> ourselves and not to give him too much time to ask awkward questions.
> After what must have been an irritating pause I had the signal code
> pennant half hoisted, which meant: ‘I can see your signal, but I
> can’t make out what it is.’ The cruiser came gradually closer. Her
> silhouette was very narrow. She was about three points to starboard
> now, but still at a distance of about 15,000 yards and travelling at
> about twenty knots an hour. Strong smoke development suggested that
> she was stoking up all of her furnaces.
>
> After allowing a suitable time to elapse we informed her that we
> had now understood; and then, without any hurry, I hoisted the
> recognition signal of the Straat Malakka. My Chief Signalman Ahlbach
> had caught on now: he realized that I was playing for time for all
> I was worth; and in this he aided and abetted me manfully. Of the
> four flags only three appeared at first, and when the four flags finally
> appeared they were hopelessly twisted. With that the signal was lowered
> to allow the flags to be cleared before they were hoisted again. How
> well Ahlbach did his job was confirmed by the fact that the cruiser had
> to signal twice to get us to clear our signal so that he could read it.
> They were quite unsuspicious, it appeared, and they seemed to be showing
> understanding and consideration for an awkward fellow not much good
> at signalling.
>
> Now he knew who we were supposed to be: a Dutchman, the Straat
> Malakka. But would he believe it? I knew that the real Straat Malakka
> was about our size and shape, and it was certainly quite possible to
> take us for her. And we also knew that she was somewhere around in
> the Indian Ocean; but where exactly was another matter. It was to be
> hoped that this fellow didn’t know either. By bad luck he might had left
> the Straat Malakka behind in port. Or he might inquire by wireless; but
> at least he wasn’t doing that, for my W/T room reported that the enemy
> was maintaining wireless silence.
>
> The cruiser now morsed the he had understood us at last and
> asked us where we were bound for. Trusting to luck I replied ‘Batavia’.
> This was quite reasonable, the fact that we were steering 250 degrees
> could readily be interpreted as a normal evasive action on sighting the
> cruiser. But what I didn’t understand was why he didn’t signal me to
> heave to. That would have been very disagreeable, because a ship
> losing way would have been swung around in the swell and we should have
> shown our broadside to the enemy approaching us in line. I took it
> that the British usually did not stop ships at sea unless there was
> something suspicious about them – for they certainly had sufficient
> experience in stopping and searching ships. Which could only mean that
> they found nothing suspicious about us. Splendid!
>
> At 16.35 hours a message arrived on the bridge to the effect that
> No. 4 motor had been temporarily patched up and could run again minus
> one cylinder. The lads had worked like Trojans to achieve that. But I
> kept the same speed of fourteen knots now in order not to awaken
> suspicions in the mind of my trustful enemy by any chance. Further,
> the speed of fourteen knots was more appropriate to my disguise as the
> Dutchman. A little after that my Chief, Lieutenant Scheer, came on to
> the bridge to explain just what had happened to motor No. 4, and I
> showed him the cruiser. After a word or two he went back to his battle
> station, and that was the last I saw of him.
>
> The enemy cruiser was between eight and nine thousand yards off
> now, and still coming closer. Up to know we had ranged him with our
> 3 m. apparatus, but even with every precaution I thought it dangerous
> to let our range-finding apparatus to be seen above the camouflage, so
> we withdrew it and used our much less noticeable 0.75 m. anti-aircraft
> apparatus instead. This apparatus was portable and could be used from
> the bridge without attracting attention. The enemy cruiser was now
> coming within the range that I considered suitable for my guns, and she
> was already so close that through our glasses we could see every detail
> clearly. In particular we could see that her four double turrets with
> their six-inch guns and also the port torpedo-tube battery were all
> directed at us. As far as I could make out her eight 4-inch anti-
> aircraft guns were not manned. So much the better. We knew that
> generally speaking the British did not man their anti-aircraft guns
> when there was no air alert. If they had done so now it would have
> increased the enemy cruiser’s artillery superiority.

Posted via email from mahan’s posterous

KORMORAN v. SYDNEY – part 2

Friday, January 2nd, 2009

From Mon Sep 01 15:34:21 1997
>Date: Mon, 01 Sep 1997 18:33:13 EST
>From: EDWARD WITTENBERG
>To: MARHST-L@POST.QUEENSU.CA, MAHAN@MICROWRKS.COM,
> WWII-L@LISTSERV.ACSU.BUFFALO.EDU
>CC: wew@papa.uncp.edu
>Subject: KORMORAN v. SYDNEY – part 2
>Precendence: bulk
>Sender: mahan-owner@microworks.net
>
>The following excerpt is taken from _The Raider Kormoran_ by Theodor
>Detmers (London: Tandem Publishing Ltd, 1975. Edward Fitzgerald, trans).
>
>Edward Wittenberg
>wew@papa.uncp.edu
>
>
> There was no sign of any diminution of speed on the enemy’s
> part, and she came up steadily with an unchanging bow wave, still
> showing us the narrowest possible silhouette. She was still obviously
> still curious about us, and now she wanted to know what cargo we were
> carrying. I replied vaguely ‘piece-goods’. They could make what they
> liked of that. My signalman were working away slowly and inefficiently,
> and it was terribly difficult for us to make ourselves understood. I
> now hoisted the Dutch flag and to make the confusion still worse I
> began to use my wireless, sending out the ‘Q’ signal: ‘QQQ Straat
> Malakka’, and informing the world that we were being challenged by an
> unknown cruiser. Perth wireless station picked up my signals,
> acknowledged receipt, and gave the ‘understood’ sign, telling me to
> keep in touch.
>
> My men had been at action stations for over an hour now and it
> seemed a long time to wait, particularly as they could see and hear
> nothing; and as I expected action to be opened at any moment I now
> spoke to all stations over the intercom informing them that we were
> about to go into action with a small cruiser which we should be well
> able to dispose of. An answering cheer told me that everything was in
> order.
>
> I could now see that the enemy cruiser now had a plane on the
> catapult. The engine was probably warming up. At any moment it would
> be catapulted into the air; and once the observer spotted us from above
> he would recognize us at once for what we were, an auxiliary cruiser.
> Or at the very least he would wireless back that we looked highly
> suspicious. It might be possible to conceal the range-finding crew with
> their apparatus before the plane arrived, but the camouflage of the
> guns in Hatches 2 and 4 was not so perfect that it could stand such
> close scrutiny. The plane was almost certain to start; the wind and
> weather conditions simply called for it.
>
> But at least the enemy was only something over three thousand
> yards away now, a beautiful shooting range. Would she slow down?
> Would she order us to heave to? Would she turn her broadside on us?
> And what should I do? Had the time come to de-camouflage and run up
> the war flag? Was the enemy in the best possible position for me to
> open fire? No, not yet, I decided because three thousand yards was
> about the extreme effective range of my anti-aircraft guns; and I
> wanted every gun I had to bear at its maximum effectiveness in order
> to give me the biggest possible chance. So let her come a bit closer
> still. The closer she came the better it would be for us. I therefore
> continued to leave the initiative to the enemy.
>
> For some time now we had been expecting a signal that would call
> our bluff, but so far nothing had come beyond almost casual queries
> which we had almost no difficulty in answering with some show of
> reason. The enemy now changed course to a point or two starboard so
> that the cruisers silhouette became a little broader, which was also
> to the good. But at the same time she morsed: ‘Give your secret call!’
> We had been expecting some such signal for about an hour. There it was
> at last. The denouement was very close now, because, of course, we
> did not know the secret call sign of the Straat Malakka.
>
> But for the moment I was still interested in stringing the enemy
> along, because every passing minute was improving my position. ‘Slowly!
> Slowly!’ I called to Ahlbach, who was still deliberately fumbling with
> the signal flags, and dragging out matters as long as possible. The
> cruiser now repeated her morse signal: ‘Give your secret call!’ So much
> time had now been gained that she was broadside on a sailing a course
> parallel to that of the Kormoran at a reduced speed. The range was only
> about a thousand yards now and we could see the cruiser’s pantrymen in
> their white coats lining the rails to have a look at the supposed
> Dutchman. It was the sort of happy picture you see on a sunny day in
> peacetime when two ships meet at sea. But it was a peaceful picture
> soon to be shattered.
>
> In reply to the cruiser’s signal demanding that I should give my
> secret call I could still have done what I would certainly have done had
> she asked me earlier on. I could pretend to be mistrustful, and instead
> of replying I could have asked the cruiser her name. Had I done so I
> am quite certain that I would have gained further time, because that
> was just the suspicious sort of attitude a cautious Dutch sea captain
> might have been expected to adopt in such circumstances. He would
> have wanted to be quite certain before revealing his secret call sign.
>
> But the situation was different now. I needed no more time. My
> eyes were glued to the bearings compass, and as soon as I saw that the
> enemy had come practically to a standstill I gave the order ‘De-
> camouflage!’ The time was exactly 17.30 hours. The Dutch flag was
> hauled down, and the German naval war flag ran up and fluttered
> proudly in the breeze from our foretop.
>
> As soon as my Chief Signalman reported ‘War flag flying’ I gave
> the order to open fire to my gunners and torpedo batteries. From the
> moment the order to de-camouflage was given the miracle speed and
> efficiency which my men had been preparing for and practising for
> months took place. The ship’s rails folded down, the heavy camouflage
> covers fore and aft were whisked away, Hatches 2 and 4 opened up to
> reveal their guns, the 2 cm. anti-aircraft guns were raised, the
> torpedo flaps opened, and all barrels and torpedo tubes swung on to
> the target. Within six seconds of the order to de-camouflage the first
> shot was fired from our leading gun. Four seconds later the other three
> went into action, scoring direct hits on the enemy’s bridge and in his
> artillery control post.
>
> Immediately after the enemy opened fire too, with a full salvo. But
> it roared away harmlessly over us, probably over our stern. Then we
> fired eight salvoes, with six seconds between each salvo, without any
> answering fire at all from the enemy. Obviously his artillery control
> centre had been put out of action by our very first salvo. At that
> short range every shell we fired was a direct hit. At the same time our
> anti-aircraft guns peppered the enemy’s upper deck and his torpedo
> batteries, and our army 3.7 anti-aircraft guns pumped shells into his
> bridge.
>
> Our own torpedoes were now discharged at the enemy, and to do
> this I had to turn to 260 degrees, which I did with very little helm
> movement in order not to disturb the our gunners. One of the first two
> torpedoes passed across the cruiser’s bows, but the other hit her abaft
> Turret A. An enormous column of water shot into the air and her stern
> dipped into the water up to the flag staff. Both fore turrets seemed to
> be out of action, for we didn’t get another shot from them. After we
> had fired eight salvoes, Turrets C and D began to fire independently.
> Turret D fired two or three salvoes, but they went wide. After that it
> ceased firing altogether. But Turret C continued to fire, and with some
> considerable accuracy. The first salvo was too high, and it ripped
> through our funnel at about bridge height, but its next hit us
> amidships and set our engine-room on fire.
>
> Our own guns were continuing to fire rapidly and steadily and
> doing the enemy a tremendous amount of damage. A motor-cutter was
> hanging helplessly halfway over the side, the heavy turret deck of
> Turret B had been lifted out of its implacement and hurled overboard.
> The plane which had been on the catapult had been blown into the sea,
> and flames were shooting up everywhere. Not a man could show his face
> on the upper deck, because the fire from our 2 cm. anti-aircraft guns
> and our heavy machine-guns was so intense, whilst our 3.7 anti-aircraft
> guns continued to pump shells into the bridge structure. Not a torpedo
> was fired at us. In all probability the hail of shells from our anti-
> aircraft weapons was so intense that no one could release the safety
> catch on the tubes.
>
> The enemy cruiser now turned towards us and passed behind our
> stern. It almost looked as if she was trying to ram us, but for that
> she was already too far down by the stern, and she no longer had any
> speed. I thought perhaps she was turning in order to bring her
> starboard torpedo tubes into action after having released the safety
> catches of the tubes under cover of her lee. But no torpedoes were
> discharged, and our anti-aircraft guns now swept her starboard side
> devastatingly.
>
> As the battered cruiser came behind our stern she enjoyed a
> short respite, because on account of our midships structure our forward
> guns were temporarily unsighted, so that for a while we had only two
> guns in action. I kept to my course in order to show the narrowest
> possible silhouette to any torpedo attack, but none came. A lot of smoke
> was now drifting away to stern out of starboard from the fire in our
> engine-room. In consequence my gunnery officer at our artillery control
> point could no longer see a thing, and handed over to the anti-aircraft
> gunnery officer who was aft on the poop. He continued to direct the
> fire of our stern guns, but he was getting no counter-fire at all now,
> and all the enemy’s turrets seemed out of action, and their gun barrels
> were pointing helplessly away. The enemy’s anti-aircraft guns had not
> been manned at all during the engagement, and they were still silent.
>
> The crews of our guns 1, 3 and 4 used this enforced pause in
> their operations to cool down their barrels with fire hoses, because the
> rapid firing had made them so hot that they could hardly be used any
> longer. But it was only a short pause and then all four guns were in
> action again; that is to say, guns No. 2, 3, 4 and 6. Guns No. 1 and 5
> were now in our firing lee and unable to take part in the further
> action. My gunnery officer took over again.
>
> At about 18.00 hours I wanted to turn to port to run parallel with
> the enemy and finally destroy her, and the helm was already in position
> when the sailor at the engine-room telegraph reported that the
> revolutions of both machines was falling away rapidly and the contact
> with the engine-room had been broken. At that moment I saw the wake
> of four torpedoes the enemy had discharged at us, but to my relief it
> was clear that at our present speed and on our present course they
> were going to pass harmlessly astern. I therefore made no change in my
> course and they disappeared behind us at a distance of between one
> hundred and two hundred yards.
>
> Immediately after they had passed the whole ship shuddered from
> stem to stern owing to the failure of our engines. Shortly before this
> I had given instructions to be passed to my Chief leaving it to his
> discretion to abandon his control stand – which was cut off from the
> engine-room by glass – if the heat he was complaining of increased
> intolerably. The orderly now returned and reported that he could get no
> answer from anyone. The engine-room itself was out of action. He was
> instructed to see if at least one of the engines could be got going
> again.
>
> In the meantime, our guns were keeping up their devastating fire,
> and the enemy was receiving one direct hit after the other. From the
> fore bridge to the stern mast the cruiser was now a mass of flame and
> she was moving forward only very slowly. We were unable to move at
> all, so we sent a torpedo after her at about 8,000 yards, but it passed
> harmlessly behind her stern.
>
> At 18.25 hours I gave the order to cease-fire. By this time the
> enemy cruiser was over ten thousand yards distant; drifting rather than
> sailing, and little more than a flaming hulk. It was growing dark
> rapidly now, and she gradually faded into the darkness, apparently
> making for Perth. Up until 21.00 hours we could see the glow, and then
> we saw the flames suddenly dart up even higher as though from an
> explosion, and after that the battered hulk of our enemy disappeared
> into the night.
>
> My aim now was to lower and launch as many of our boats as
> were still serviceable, and now that the engagement was over I wanted
> to see whether or not it was possible to keep my ship afloat or not.
> Amidships the Kormoran was well alight, and I hurried through the
> corridor on the port side and saw that the cabins there were burning. I
> opened the midships door into the engine-room, but billows of thick
> smoke rolled out, and darting flames shot up. With some difficulty, I
> got the door closed again, and then I hurried aft where I met the
> technical personnel, who informed me that the fire-fighting equipment
> in the engine-room had apparently been destroyed and that the whole
> starboard foam equipment was also out of action. An attempt to get
> into action from the screw machine chamber, which was quite undamaged,
> failed. There was no pressure in the damaged pipes.
>
> In this hopeless situation it was obviously impossible to get the
> engine-room running again even in part, so we concentrated our efforts
> on trying to rescue our comrades who were shut in there, but
> unfortunately everything we tried failed, and we were beaten back by
> smoke, flames and heat wherever we attempted to force a way through.
>
>Detmers and his crew abandoned the ship at 23.00 hours after stripping
>her of any supplies which could prove to be useful and setting explosive
>charges near her oil bunkers. Shortly afterwards, Kormoran disappeared
>beneath the waves forever. Detmers’ boat, containing some sixty-two men,
>was picked up by the steamer Centaur on the twenty-sixth. Centaur’s captain
>would not allow the able-bodied survivors on board, for fear of their
>overpowering the crew and seizing the ship. He did, however, undertake to
>tow Detmers and his party into port while supplying them with food and
>water. Detmers and 320 of his crew would eventually be rescued, but of the
>Sydney and her 644-man crew no trace was ever found. Kormoran’s officers
>were eventually housed at Dhurringile prisoner-of-war camp, while the
>remainder of the crew were housed at Graytown. Detmers and his crew
>remained in internment for two years after the end of the war, but were
>repatriated to Germany in February 1947.

Posted via email from mahan’s posterous

Thai CV: Reuter article

Friday, January 2nd, 2009

From Tue Sep 02 16:00:25 1997
>Date: Tue, 02 Sep 1997 15:58:19 -0700
>From: Mike Potter
>Reply-To: mike.potter@artecon.com
>Organization: Artecon, Inc.
>X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01Gold (WinNT; I)
>To: mahan@microworks.net
>Subject: Thai CV: Reuter article
>Precendence: bulk
>Sender: mahan-owner@microworks.net
>
>Quoted verbatim including headline . . .
>
>Thailand Purchases Aircraft Carrier
>———————————–
>
>SATTAHIP, Thailand, Aug 10 (Reuter) – Thailand took delivery of
>Southeast Asia’s first aircraft carrier on Sunday, heralding its arrival
>with a military flypast and a vertical take-off by a Sea Harrier jump
>jet.
>
>Thai Prime Minister Chavalit Yongchaiyudh officiated at the
>commissioning ceremony before opening the vessel, Spanish-built HTMS
>Chakri Naruebet, to the public.
>
>The carrier is capable of carrying nine British-made Sea Harrier jets
>and six Sikorsky Seahawk helicopters. It cost the government 7.1 billion
>baht (US$230 million).
>
>–

Posted via email from mahan’s posterous

Purpose
The Mahan Naval Discussion List hosted here at NavalStrategy.org is to foster discussion and debate on the relevance of Admiral Alfred Thayer Mahan's ideas on the importance of sea power influenced navies around the world.
Links