Archive for the ‘1997’ Category

“Coincidental” submarine losses: A “Sea Tale”?

Friday, January 2nd, 2009

From Fri Sep 19 09:11:30 1997
>X-Authentication-Warning: ecom5.ecn.bgu.edu: mslrc owned process doing -bs
>Date: Fri, 19 Sep 1997 11:10:24 -0500 (CDT)
>From: “Louis R. Coatney”
>X-Sender: mslrc@ecom5.ecn.bgu.edu
>To: Marine History Information Exchange Group ,
> mahan@microwrks.com, consim-l@listserv.uni-c.dk
>cc: “Louis R. Coatney” ,
> “William D. Anderson”
>Subject: “Coincidental” submarine losses: A “Sea Tale”?
>Precendence: bulk
>Sender: mahan-owner@microworks.net
>
>On Fri, 19 Sep 1997, Tom Riley wrote:
> > I don’t know about this book, but I seem to remember a french submarine
> > lost the same year in the Med and one of our ships ( sub or surface I dont
> > remember) damaged or sunk at the same time. Did the Sovs ( now former
> > Sovs) lose a sub as well?
>
>Our boat was SCORPION, I believe, Tom. And someone … either on here or
> MAHAN … (Was it you, Andrew?) … has noted and pondered this
> questionable coincidence of lost boats, before.
>
>If there *was* an undeclared undersea skirmish, you would think enough
> time and governments have passed that we could learn the truth, now.
> Is *this* why the Israelis are so nervous?
>
>Hmmm … Would “Sea Tales” want to do some *investigative* reporting?
>
>Lou
> Coatney, mslrc@uxa.ecn.bgu.edu

Posted via email from mahan’s posterous

River Kwai memorial for USS Houston survivors

Friday, January 2nd, 2009

From Fri Sep 19 17:53:41 1997
>X-Mailer: SuperTCP Internet for Windows Version 5.1 (Mailer Version 1.02)
>From: Peter Sinfield
>Date: Sat, 20 Sep 1997 10:56:52 cst
>Subject: Re: River Kwai memorial for USS Houston survivors
>To: mahan@microworks.net
>Precendence: bulk
>Sender: mahan-owner@microworks.net
>Reply-To: mahan@microworks.net
>
>Floyd Mack asked the name of the tune the POWs in the film were
>whistling.
>
>Colonel Bogey March – although Col. Bogey doesn’t rate a mention in the
>words I’ve heard to the tune!
>
>
>Peter
>
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>Peter Sinfield
>Canberra ACT AUSTRALIA
>email: sinfip@anao.gov.au
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Posted via email from mahan’s posterous

Another River Kwai kwiz

Friday, January 2nd, 2009

From Fri Sep 19 18:06:01 1997
>X-Mailer: SuperTCP Internet for Windows Version 5.1 (Mailer Version 1.02)
>From: Peter Sinfield
>Date: Sat, 20 Sep 1997 11:08:03 cst
>Subject: Re: Another River Kwai kwiz
>To: mahan@microworks.net
>Precendence: bulk
>Sender: mahan-owner@microworks.net
>Reply-To: mahan@microworks.net
>
>Mike Potter asks:
>
> >
> >How did the US Navy (and Jane’s) discover =Houston=’s fate while war
> >was still in progress against Japan?
> >
>
>HOUSTON was sunk in Sunda Strait in company with HMAS PERTH. The
>Japanese “hell ship” RAKAYO MARU (sp?- sorry, I’m at work) was sunk by
>US subs. in the South China Sea while transporting PWs (including some
>PERTH survivors) to Japan in 1944. The PAMPANITO (sp?) picked up (IIRC
>4) ex-PERTH men, which was the first time Australia learned of the
>light cruiser’s fate. Perhaps the details of HOUSTON’s gallant last
>fight came from the same source?
>
>Peter
>
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>Peter Sinfield
>Canberra ACT AUSTRALIA
>email: sinfip@anao.gov.au
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Posted via email from mahan’s posterous

WWII USN Order of Battle (fwd)

Friday, January 2nd, 2009

From Sat Sep 20 09:48:15 1997
>Date: Sat, 20 Sep 97 18:46 MET DST
>To: marhst-l@post.queensu.ca, >mahan@microwrks.com, wwii-l@listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu
>Subject: Re: WWII USN Order of Battle (fwd)
>X-Mailer: T-Online eMail 2.0
>X-Sender: 0611603955-0001@t-online.de (Silvia Lanzendoerfer)
>From: BWV_WIESBADEN@t-online.de (Tim Lanzendoerfer)
>Precendence: bulk
>Sender: mahan-owner@microworks.net
>Reply-To: mahan@microworks.net
>
> > Thanks for the prompt reply.
> > I am trying to do a complete order of Battle of all forces in the Pacific
> > Theater on 8/7 December 1941.
> > For the Pacific Area of the USN (Pacific Fleet, Asiatic Fleet, 11th, 12th,
> > 13th, 14th, 15th, and 16th Naval Districts, as well as Shore Establishments
> > on West Coats, Hawaii, Philippines, and Canal Zone)on 7 December 1941 I
> > would like:
> >
> > 1. the administrative command structure
> > 2. the tactical order of battle on 7 December 1941 (TF’s, etc.)
> > best regards
> > Leo
>
>Here we go again. Anybody who has the info Leo needs?
>
>Tim
>
>Tim Lanzendörfer | “Lebt der Herr Reichskanzler noch?
>Amateur Naval Historian | Und wenn ja, was gedenkt er dagegen
>Email: BWV_Wiesbaden@t-online.de | zu tun?” – Private letter, 1905
>
> The United States Navy in the Pacific War 1941 – 1945
> http://www.microworks.net/pacific/index.htm
> The ships, the men, the battles

Posted via email from mahan’s posterous

GREAT military/naval link webpage!

Friday, January 2nd, 2009

From Sat Sep 20 17:24:25 1997
>X-Authentication-Warning: ecom6.ecn.bgu.edu: mslrc owned process doing -bs
>Date: Sat, 20 Sep 1997 19:23:56 -0500 (CDT)
>From: “Louis R. Coatney”
>X-Sender: mslrc@ecom6.ecn.bgu.edu
>To: World War II Discussion List ,
> milhst-l@ukanvm.cc.ukans.edu, mahan@microwrks.com,
> marhst-l@qucdn.queensu.ca, consim-l@listserv.uni-c.dk
>cc: “Louis R. Coatney” ,
> “William D. Anderson” ,
> navarrov@LEAV-EMH.ARMY.MIL
>Subject: GREAT military/naval link webpage!
>Precendence: bulk
>Sender: mahan-owner@microworks.net
>Reply-To: mahan@microworks.net
>
>
>At … www-cgsc.army.mil/carl/gateway.htm
>
>This is the Combined Arms Research Library’s “gateway to the Web”
> page … and it has everything imaginable listed which would be
> of any interest to military/naval science/history researchers.
>
>(Tim, the Naval Historical Center is listed there.)
>
>The “Clip Art” link did 404 — dead-end — though.
>
>Lou Coatney, mslrc@uxa.ecn.bgu.edu
>www.wiu.edu/users/mslrc/ (free game and cardstock model warship)
>Macomb, IL

Posted via email from mahan’s posterous

Loss of S.S. Delhi, 13 December 1911, Pt 1

Friday, January 2nd, 2009

From Sun Sep 21 21:15:34 1997
>Date: Sun, 21 Sep 1997 23:16:40 -0600
>From: Brooks A Rowlett
>Organization: None whatsoever
>X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01-C-MACOS8 (Macintosh; I; PPC)
>To: “C. Patrick Hreachmack” ,
> “Jim O’Neil” , Joe Cunningham ,
> Mahan Naval History Mailing List ,
> MARHST ,
> WWOne Mailing List
>Subject: Loss of S.S. Delhi, 13 December 1911, Pt 1
>Precendence: bulk
>Sender: mahan-owner@microworks.net
>Reply-To: mahan@microworks.net
>
>Brooks here. This posting is going to 3 appropriate mailing lists
>and a few friends who may find it of interest.
>
>Background. I have a friend here, a military collector who particulary
>likes Medal (award) groupings – the person’s set of decorations – from
>British soldiers and sailors. He recently acquired a medal group of
>some interest as follows, in that the sailor, one George Henry Spencer,
>possessed service medals for both World Wars, as well as the “Board of
>Trade Bronze medal for Saving Life at Sea”.
>
>With the medal group, my friend acquired what I take to be the actual
>service record, a large parchment sheet, which the serviceman carried
>with him from depot to depot and ship to ship, and which was filled with
>notes, evaluation reports from his ship’s Captain, and the like. The
>bare outlines of his service record are as follows: Born 24 November
>1888 Notham Parish Southampton; 5 feet 4-1/2 inches tall; his service
>recordslists “numerous tattoos” as distinguishing marks. He joined
>”St Vincent” (shore station) at his enlistment on 6 September 1904. He
>served primarily in cruisers in the pre-War and WWI periods, serving on
>the elderly cruiser LEVIATHAN during WWI. Between the wars he served in
>several QUEEN ELIZABETH and ‘R’ class battleships, going back to
>cruisers in the 1930’s. On note of interest here is that he detached
>from HMS SUSSEX (County class heavy cruiser) on 3 March 1938 to serve in
>a vessel noted as “St. Angelo II” (Hostile)” untill detaching from her
>on23 May 1938 at Pembroke Dockyard. He spent the last two years of WWII
>at HMS VICTORY presumably doing shore work, and was discharged finally
>as a Chief Petty Officer, 14 August 1945.
>
>Obviously, my first question, can anyone provide further information on
>the “ST. ANGELO II (hostile)”. Was this some blockade-running vessel
>intercepted and taken into custody during the Spanish Civil War?
>
>To continue: the package my friend bought also contained a passcard,
>and Mr. Spencer’s handwritten account of the event which resulted in
>his receipt of the Lifesaving Medal. The passcard says:
>
> “INVESTITURE BY THE KING”
>
> in larger type:
> “Board of Trade Bronze Medal
> for Saving Life at Sea.”
>
> smaller type again:
> ” TO BE DECORATED.”
>
>(signature line, with “George Spencer”)
>
>down the left side, in smaller type than elsewhere used:
>”This card to be given to the Lord Chamberlain
> on entering the presence of The King”
>
>My friend passed me a typewritten transcription of the the handwritten
>account. This presented an opportunity for me to test the optical
>character recognition (OCR) software with my scanner. In this and
>the next two posts, I am presenting the result. All scanner-induced
>errors are cleaned up; the remaining text is reproduced with the
>original spelling and grammer and punctuation or lack thereof in the
>account. It makes fascinating reading.
>
>
>” The Wreck of S.S. “Delhi” off Cape Spartel
> N.W. Coast of Africa 13th December 1911
>
>Before I start to relate what happened I must state that I was serving
>onboard H.M.S. “Duke of Edinburgh” as an able seaman. Now on the night
>of the 12th December 1911. We gave a farewell concert on the Quarter
>Deck before leaving for Portsmouth to give Xmas leave which we were all
>anxiously looking forward to it was quite late when the concert finished
>and in the service it is the custom to unrig the stage and decorations
>right away and it was near Midnight when we finished. We had not been
>turned in very long when we received an S.O.S. and the “Duke of
>Edinburgh being emergency ship it was our job to answer the call. So we
>slipped our wires and proceeded to the assistance of S.S. “Delhi” which
>had stranded off Cape Spartel.”
>
>TO BE CONTINUED……

Posted via email from mahan’s posterous

Loss of S.S. Delhi, Conclusion

Friday, January 2nd, 2009

From Sun Sep 21 21:38:28 1997
>Date: Sun, 21 Sep 1997 23:37:16 -0600
>From: Brooks A Rowlett
>Organization: None whatsoever
>X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01-C-MACOS8 (Macintosh; I; PPC)
>To: “C. Patrick Hreachmack” ,
> “Jim O’Neil” , Joe Cunningham ,
> Mahan Naval History Mailing List ,
> MARHST ,
> WWOne Mailing List
>Subject: Loss of S.S. Delhi, Conclusion
>Precendence: bulk
>Sender: mahan-owner@microworks.net
>Reply-To: mahan@microworks.net
>
>”after what seemed an eternity we were on dry land the people went on
>to a lighthouse which was near by until arrangements could be made for
>them to travel to Tangiers which was roughly 21 miles from Cape Spartel
>it must have been very trying for them as it was not very warm and no
>dry clothes to put on. Now before I go any further I must tell you that
>Rear Admiral Sir Christopher Craddock was in our boat and did some very
>gallant work indeed, not only by his good management in getting our boat
>alongside the wreck but was very instrumental after a great struggle in
>getting the Duke & Duchess safely on the beach. Shortly after we landed
>we tried to launch our boat again but found she had been stove in where
>she was thrown up on the beach so had to abandon the idea. Now being
>as the ship was ashore on shifting sand she was driven near to shore
>with practically every wave that struck her we then tried the Breeches
>Buoy which had been brought round from Gibraltar by a detachment of
>R.G.O. they arrived at Tangiers onboard H.M.S. Hampshire and completed
>the journey by land to Spartel Point. they soon had the Rocket
>Apperatus rigged several Rockets being fired before getting one on
>board. it was speedily made fast to the Foremast. On the end of the
>line attached to the Rocket is a board with instructions what to do
>printed in several languidges, after this was done it became rather
>amusing because when the Breeches Buoy was midway between ship and
>shore the occupant of the Buoy got a very severe ducking we succeeded
>in getting all the crew ashore without any further mishap while this
>work was going on a detachment of Algerian Cavalry had arrived from
>Tangiers and pitched a camp for us to shelter in during the nights we
>were there for 5 days, on the second morning the Duke of Edinburgh
>accompanied by the Good Hope proceeded to Portsmouth leaving us behind.
>it made us feel a little down hearted at the time as we were all
>anxious to get home with our friends and relations. Now the only thing
>we had to do now was to join the “London” which was lying at Anchor in
>Tangiers. this meant a journey overland a distance roughly 21 miles and
>I can tell you we did not relish that very much as we never had much
>sleep we had nothing to cover over us at night and no soft bed to lie
>on so you can imagine how we felt the evening before we left the
>Admiral informed us that the British Consul at Tangiers had made
>arrangements for ponies and mules to be sent to our camp to convey us to
>our destination. now this journey was very amusing as the animals had no
>reins or even saddles if they had been at all restive I am afraid we
>should had to have completed our journey on foot but they were very
>quiet so now we connence our journey in single line ahead I think they
>must have been trained for the job as it was very seldom one overtook
>the other their trotting days were over, the first thing we saw after we
>left the beach just over a small hill was a group of mud huts a little
>village occupied by a few Brigands and no doubt if we had not the Guard
>with us one or two would have be held for ransom these huts were not
>very large the entrances was a hole just big enough for a man to crawl
>through. they were a fine specimen of manhood a few stood by as we
>passed their bodies just like a piece of Ebony but they were quite
>harmless. we were traveling over very difficult country and it was well
>in the evening when we arrived at Tangiers. a few of us had already
>discarded our mounts and finished on foot it is not very pleaseant
>riding without a saddle On our arrival we found the Londons boats
>already waiting for us we were very soon on board and sitting down to
>good meal and we paid full justice to it most of the time we only had
>biscuits. As soon as we arrived on the ship we put to sea homeward
>bound at last. but our troubles were not over as we ran into a very
>severe storm during the night we all had to turn out and secure the
>torpedo nets where the lashings had been carried away by the sea during
>this time the ship was eased down with just enough way to keep head on
>her course we were tossing about like a cork two men were lost overboard
>during this operation. When the watch was mustered later it was found
>that a Petty Officer was missing in fact he must have been washed
>overboard as he was never seen again the ship steamed round the spot as
>near as could be. I am very doubtful if we could have saved any of them
>had we seen them we read the Service the following morning finally we
>arrived at Dover after a very dirty passage as soon as the ship was
>secured alongside we entrained to joined our ship at Portsmouth and
>thence on leave which was very acceptable nothing more of importance
>occurred until we were on our way back again we were not far from the
>Straits of Gibraltar when we passed the Good Hope conveying the Body of
>the Duke of Fife to England apparently the immersion in the water cost
>him his life we fired a salute as we passed then continued our journey
>to Gibraltar during our stay there we were presented with a signed
>photograph of the Duke & Duchess of Fife and their two Daughters we
>returned to Portsmouth and paid off on the 14th March 1912 on three of
>the boats crew reconmissioning one Midshipman one Leading Seaman and
>myself. Now in September 1912 we were giving general leave at Rosyth I
>had just returned on board from leave when I was informed that we had
>to appear at Buckingham Palace on the 12th Sept to be invested by the
>King so we journeyed to London by rail after being decorated by the
>King we proceeded on 14 days leave rejoining the ship at Portsmouth.”
>
>(End of account). My questions & Comments below.
>
>1. From first posting – what is the story behind the “St. Angelo II
>(Hostile)”?
>
>2. Rear Admiral Christopher Craddock is the same Craddock who died
>aboard the GOOD HOPE some 3 years later in the Battle of Coronel, when
>GOOD HOPE and MONMOUTH were overwhelmed and sunk by Admiral Graf von
>Spee’s German Pacific Squadron of the SCHARNHORST and GNEISENAU.
>(My reason for incluidng the World War I Mailing List in the
>distribution).
>
>3. Who specifically was the Duke of Fife, and why are the daughters
>Princesses?
>
>4. Can anyone provide further details of the vessel S.S. DELHI,
>and her loss?
>
>5. What is the “R.G.O.” organization which brought out the rockets and
>breeches buoy gear?
>
>6. Are there any French accounts of this rescue, associated with FRYANT
>(which my CONWAY’S ALL THE WORLD’S WARSHIPS 1860-1905 says should be
>FRIANT)?
>
>6. And of course, any other questions or comments that various
>listmembers may have come to mind as a result of this information.
>for one thing, my friend with these has noted that he believe only some
>500 of these Board of Trade Bronze Medals were awarded; perhaps someone
>else can say over what period these were in distribution and what
>replaced them?
>
>-Brooks A Rowlett
>brooksar@indy.net

Posted via email from mahan’s posterous

Loss of S.S. Dehi, Pt 2

Friday, January 2nd, 2009

From Sun Sep 21 21:19:12 1997
>Date: Sun, 21 Sep 1997 23:20:36 -0600
>From: Brooks A Rowlett
>Organization: None whatsoever
>X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01-C-MACOS8 (Macintosh; I; PPC)
>To: “C. Patrick Hreachmack” ,
> “Jim O’Neil” , Joe Cunningham ,
> Mahan Naval History Mailing List ,
> MARHST ,
> WWOne Mailing List
>Subject: Loss of S.S. Dehi, Pt 2
>Precendence: bulk
>Sender: mahan-owner@microworks.net
>Reply-To: mahan@microworks.net
>
>CONTINUE FROM PREVIOUS POST GEORGE SPENCER’S ACCOUNT OR RESCUE
>OPERATION SIN LOSS OF S.S. DELHI
>
>”We arrived there between 3 and 4 in the morning 13th December. Owing
>to the heavy surf that was running it was absolutely impossible to get
>her off so the only thing we could do was to get the passengers off as
>quick as possible. We had a hard job to get to the ship as the sea was
>breaking right over her we managed to get alongside with only 3 oars
>left but we replaced them from the stranded vessel. We were not along
>in this rescue work as we found on arrival that a French cruiser had
>also answered the S.O.S. her name was “Fryant” and her boat done some
>very good work indeed but unfortunately came to grief which is
>explained below. As soon as we got alongside the “Delhi” we put all the
>women and children into her only remaining boat the others were smashed
>by the sea as they were being lowered it was heartaching to see little
>children pass into the boat wearing lifebelts as big as themselves I
>shall never forget that boat being towed away by the Frenchman it got
>almost round the stern of the ship when the tow line carried away. our
>hair stood on end expecting every minute to see the boat capsize with
>its human load but owing to the good management of the French boat she
>was able to pick her up again and succeeded in getting her through the
>surf and safely alongside the “Duke of Edinburgh” the Officers gave up
>their cabins to enable them to get their clothes dried as it is needless
>to say they had a good soaking our ship took them to Gibraltar to await
>another Liner to continue their journey. Now the French boat after
>putting the people onboard our ship returned to make another attempt but
>fate was dead against her, for as she tried to come around the stern of
>the Wreck a tremendous great surf broke right over her putting her fires
>out you must understand she was steam driven not a pulling boat like
>ours. after having her fires put out she dropped her anchor riding head
>on to the sea until she could get her fires going again she finally
>succeeded, slipped her anchor, but before she had gone many yards the
>sea picked her up and turning a complete somersault dissappeared but
>fortunately only one of the crew were lost his body was washed ashore
>the following morning the remainder of the crew managed to reach the
>shore safely. Now it came to our turn all this time we were being
>tossed up and down the ships side which was not very comfortable we
>dropped alongside of her accomodation ladder to embark the few
>passengers that were still on board they were the Duke and Duchess of
>Fife their two Daughters Princess Alexandra and Princess Maud and a
>Civilian Doctor these persons were the last to leave the ship with the
>exception of her crew we had great difficulty in getting them into the
>boat but we succeeded at last and pushed off from the ship our
>intention was to tow a grass line ashore bury the end to enable us to
>hand ourselves back to the ship again and get the crew ashore but before
>we got very far the boat was swamped. the Princesses were very plucky
>through it all they tried to bale the boat out as we were fighting
>hard to beach her. we managed to get about half way to shore, when a
>great surf threw us all out of the boat it was impossible to reach her
>again as she was to far away so we had to strike out for the shore “..
>….
>
>TO BE CONCLUDED IN NEXT POSTING

Posted via email from mahan’s posterous

River Kwai memorial for USS Houston survivors -Reply

Friday, January 2nd, 2009

From Sun Sep 21 23:35:52 1997
>Date: Sun, 21 Sep 1997 23:21:23 -0700
>From: Tracy Johnson
>Organization: Answers
>X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (Win95; I)
>To: mahan@microworks.net
>Subject: Re: River Kwai memorial for USS Houston survivors -Reply
>Precendence: bulk
>Sender: mahan-owner@microworks.net
>Reply-To: mahan@microworks.net
>
>The origin of the tune sounds good. Since it was stated the tune began
>before the war, it begs the following questions:
>
>Were there words to the music before the war or not?
>
>If there were, then what were the original words before the wartime
>ones?
>
>If there weren’t, then is it a typical case of words being added to an
>existing popular tune as in the case of the U.S. National Anthem?
>
>–
>Tracy Johnson
>ANSWERS, Manhattan Beach, CA
>Minister of Propaganda, Justin Thyme Productions
>tjohnson@adnetsol.com
>”Semper Pollus”
> ADC-2239-5531

Posted via email from mahan’s posterous

River Kwai memorial for USS Houston survivors -Reply -Reply

Friday, January 2nd, 2009

From Mon Sep 22 11:40:24 1997
>X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 4.1
>Date: Mon, 22 Sep 1997 14:28:56 -0400
>From: Dane Hartgrove
>To: mahan@microworks.net
>Subject: Re: River Kwai memorial for USS Houston survivors -Reply
> -Reply
>Precendence: bulk
>Sender: mahan-owner@microworks.net
>Reply-To: mahan@microworks.net
>
>Tristan Jones, in _Heart of Oak_, his memoir of coming of age in the
>World War II British navy, mentions marching to the Col. Bogey march
>during his days in training. The tune must have been a common one in
>the Andrew; doubtless the words/lyrics changed depending on the
>occasion/degree of ribaldry allowed.
>
>Dane Hartgrove

Posted via email from mahan’s posterous

Purpose
The Mahan Naval Discussion List hosted here at NavalStrategy.org is to foster discussion and debate on the relevance of Admiral Alfred Thayer Mahan's ideas on the importance of sea power influenced navies around the world.
Links