“Coincidental” submarine losses: A “Sea Tale”?

January 2nd, 2009

From Fri Sep 19 09:11:30 1997
>X-Authentication-Warning: ecom5.ecn.bgu.edu: mslrc owned process doing -bs
>Date: Fri, 19 Sep 1997 11:10:24 -0500 (CDT)
>From: “Louis R. Coatney”
>X-Sender: mslrc@ecom5.ecn.bgu.edu
>To: Marine History Information Exchange Group ,
> mahan@microwrks.com, consim-l@listserv.uni-c.dk
>cc: “Louis R. Coatney” ,
> “William D. Anderson”
>Subject: “Coincidental” submarine losses: A “Sea Tale”?
>Precendence: bulk
>Sender: mahan-owner@microworks.net
>
>On Fri, 19 Sep 1997, Tom Riley wrote:
> > I don’t know about this book, but I seem to remember a french submarine
> > lost the same year in the Med and one of our ships ( sub or surface I dont
> > remember) damaged or sunk at the same time. Did the Sovs ( now former
> > Sovs) lose a sub as well?
>
>Our boat was SCORPION, I believe, Tom. And someone … either on here or
> MAHAN … (Was it you, Andrew?) … has noted and pondered this
> questionable coincidence of lost boats, before.
>
>If there *was* an undeclared undersea skirmish, you would think enough
> time and governments have passed that we could learn the truth, now.
> Is *this* why the Israelis are so nervous?
>
>Hmmm … Would “Sea Tales” want to do some *investigative* reporting?
>
>Lou
> Coatney, mslrc@uxa.ecn.bgu.edu

Posted via email from mahan’s posterous

Purpose
The Mahan Naval Discussion List hosted here at NavalStrategy.org is to foster discussion and debate on the relevance of Admiral Alfred Thayer Mahan's ideas on the importance of sea power influenced navies around the world.
Links