MAHAN kit? Needed models. Tom Clancy.

January 2nd, 2009

From Fri May 23 13:39:17 1997
>X-Authentication-Warning: ecom2.ecn.bgu.edu: mslrc owned process doing -bs
>Date: Fri, 23 May 1997 15:38:06 -0500 (CDT)
>From: “Louis R. Coatney”
>X-Sender: mslrc@ecom2.ecn.bgu.edu
>To: seaways-shipmodeling-list@lists.best.com, mahan@microwrks.com,
> marhst-l@qucdn.queensu.ca, consim-l@listserv.uni-c.dk
>Subject: Re: MAHAN kit? Needed models. Tom Clancy.
>Precendence: bulk
>Sender: mahan-owner@microworks.net
>
>On Fri, 23 May 1997, JOHN WELIVER wrote:
> > Lou,
> > You wouldn’t happen to know if there is a kit in production that covers the
> > MAHAN class of DD’s.
>
>I’m certain there is not, unless there is an (expensive) resin kit, John.
> Ships are the least popular plastic models, and an obscure destroyer
> class isn’t going to make it into design and production, what with the
> prohibitive mastermold-making costs … even with CAD.
>
>For DECADES, I’ve petitioned (literally) the U.S. model manufacturers
> to put out cheap, simple 1:1200 Japanese and American WWII task force
> SETS. These would be ideal for kids to play with on the floor, for
> wargamers, and for WWII naval and marine history buffs — young and
> old. They would also undercut the Japanese monopoly of the (1:700)
> waterline WWII model warship market.
>
>TO NO AVAIL. American plastic model kit manufacturers are short-term-
> oriented business managers/majors with little or no sense of potential
> markets. (That is why the Japanese Pearl-Harbored them, in the first
> place, in this market sector.)
>
>TOM CLANCY is going to be at GenCon, the big wargaming convention in
> Milwaukee, this summer. (He is starting to invest in computer
> wargaming and graphics production.) I’ve already tried e-mailing
> him about my idea, but have gotten no response. (Could SOMEone
> forward this to him?)
>
>He and Larry Bond — the designer of the HARPOON and COMMAND AT SEA
> naval miniatures rules … my “Naval Action” rules are simpler,
> faster, better … 🙂 — are friends and collaborators. You would
> think that Larry would want cheap naval miniature sets available
> (via Toys R Us, etc.), so that kids would want to “regulate” their
> floorplay. (Back on Brittany Lane, the kid with the loudest voice
> and/or neatest models usually had his way. 🙂 )
>
>And World War II task forces are more desirable than “modern” TFs,
> simply because the WWII ships were in *battles* and are of
> historical importance. (In 100 years, which ENTERPRISE will be
> remembered most? … barring World War III, of course.)
>
>I trust you can sense what we are up against.
>
>Actually, 1:900 is the best floor scale, and I can build my cardstock
> models in any scale I want anyway.
>
>Lou Coatney, mslrc@uxa.ecn.bgu.edu
>

Posted via email from mahan’s posterous

Purpose
The Mahan Naval Discussion List hosted here at NavalStrategy.org is to foster discussion and debate on the relevance of Admiral Alfred Thayer Mahan's ideas on the importance of sea power influenced navies around the world.
Links