[Fwd: USS Constitution Update…]
January 2nd, 2009 From
>Date: Tue, 10 Jun 1997 23:24:38 -0500
>From: Brooks A Rowlett
>Reply-To: brooksar@indy.net
>Organization: Apparently Not.
>X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01Gold (Macintosh; I; PPC)
>To: Mahan Naval History Mailing List
>Subject: [Fwd: USS Constitution Update…]
>Precendence: bulk
>Sender: mahan-owner@microworks.net
>
>Update from Andrew
>Return-Path:
>Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
> by green.indy.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA07799
> for
>Received: from reno.WPI.EDU (root@reno.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.65])
> by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.8.6.Beta5/8.8.6.Beta5) with ESMTP id UAA23583;
> Tue, 10 Jun 1997 20:00:59 -0400
>Received: from localhost (elmer@localhost [127.0.0.1])
> by reno.WPI.EDU (8.8.6.Beta5/8.8.6.Beta5) with SMTP id UAA20752;
> Tue, 10 Jun 1997 20:00:58 -0400 (EDT)
>Date: Tue, 10 Jun 1997 20:00:58 -0400 (EDT)
>From: Andrew Toppan
>To: Brooks Rowlett
> Chris Cavas
> MARHST List
>Subject: USS Constitution Update…
>Message-ID:
>Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
>
>
>
>1) Her spanker is now on, so she set 4 sails during Monday AM’s sail
>training. No sign of headsails yet, however.
>
>2) The city of Marblehead is refusing to allow Consitution to visit there
>on July 20th unless the Navy pays the city’s costs (presumably crowd
>control and the like). As we know, Constitution is supposed to go to
>Marblehead under tow on July 20, then sail home on July 21st. The Navy’s
>response to this is unknown…..I think they should just bypass the
>stuck-up folks in Marblehead and go to Gloucester instead 🙂
>
>
>
>—
>Andrew Toppan — elmer@wpi.edu
>Rail, Sea and Air InfoPages and FAQ Archive (Military & TC FAQs)
>[http://www.membrane.com/~elmer/] mirror [http://www.announce.com/~elmer/]
> “Change is inevitable, except from a vending machine”