Bormann
January 2nd, 2009 From
>X-Sender: msmall@roanoke.infi.net
>X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.1 (32)
>Date: Thu, 26 Jun 1997 21:48:00 -0400
>To: mike.potter@artecon.com
>From: Marc James Small
>Subject: Bormann
>Cc: mahan@microworks.net
>Precendence: bulk
>Sender: mahan-owner@microworks.net
>
>Without getting sidetracked on a non-naval issue, I will point out that the
>death of Martin Bormann was not proven by the ‘discovery’ of the skeleton
>in Berlin. There have been a large number of questions raised concerning
>the methods used in the identification, in the results of the analysis, and
>in the motives of those attempting to claim Bormann was dead.
>
>Simply put, the most telling argument is that, by the late 1960’s, it was
>in everyone’s interests to simply declare Bormann as dead. The finding of
>the skeleton, the alleged identification — all of these fit too neatly
>into a package of convenience.
>
>Bormann is almost certainly dead by now, as he would now be 97. But a
>death in Berlin is a non probat at best.
>
>Marc
>
>
>msmall@roanoke.infi.net FAX: +540/343-7315
>Cha robh bas fir gun ghras fir!