Vietnam: A “war between the classes (and races) in America”??

January 2nd, 2009

From Fri Jul 04 12:12:38 1997
>X-Authentication-Warning: ecom6.ecn.bgu.edu: mslrc owned process doing -bs
>Date: Fri, 4 Jul 1997 14:11:52 -0500 (CDT)
>From: “Louis R. Coatney”
>X-Sender: mslrc@ecom6.ecn.bgu.edu
>To: milhst-l@ukanvm.cc.ukans.edu, mahan@microwrks.com
>cc: “Louis R. Coatney”
>Subject: Vietnam: A “war between the classes (and races) in America”??
>Precendence: bulk
>Sender: mahan-owner@microworks.net
>
>
>Our local Congressman –loyal to Clinton … and his VN “record”–
> gave a speech to the Western Illinois U. pol sci and history students
> (and faculty) wherein he described Vietnam as “a war between the
> classes in America, and it was fought mostly by poor blacks, Hispanics,
> and working class whites.” I suppose he thought he was “preaching to
> the choir” on a campus. Unfortunately for him, I saw the article in
> the student paper. (The reporter got his speech on tape, incidentally.)
>
>(He *may* have also tried to pass himself off as a Vietnam vet …
> again, according to friends up in the Quad Cities … but that is yet
> to be determined.)
>
>Since the 3 kids in my (fully integrated) Rock Island High School Class
> of 1964 were all white middle class, I was more than a little upset by
> this and did some research.
>
>As it turns out, an article in OPERATIONS RESEARCH Sep-Oct92 was the first
> to challenge this myth, finding Vietnam deaths represented all the
> economic 10%s well enough that the “class war” accusation was false and
> cruelly unjust. Moreover, the MIT researchers found that the black
> death percentage was actually less than the percentage of those of
> military age at the time who were black.
>
>This was attacked by ATLANTIC MONTHLY Washington editor James Fallows in
> April 1993, and an exchange followed in August 1993.
>
>In the Spring 1995 issue of ARMED FORCES & SOCIETY, however, two
> separate articles confirmed that variance was not so great that VN
> could be termed a class war. (Mazur used CDC Agent Orange survey
> data of Army veterans. He found no racial bias, either.) What they
> did find was serious service/draft-dodging by a very small
> *intellectual elite* … and Fallows made his early writing reputation
> as a student gloating about the strategms he and his Ivy League
> buddies used to escape service. (Fallows took editorial control of
> U.S. NEWS in Dec96 and immediately purged its staff … which explains
> the sudden decline in its objectivity and content.)
>
>In other words … and “the beauty of this,” if you can call it that
> … the intellectual Left in this country is using its *own*
> draft-dodging to claim that VN was a “class war”! :-)))) (Why
> am I laughing?)
>
>Does anyone else know of any more recent research on this?
>
>Anyway, if you hear your local politicians or “pseudo-intellectuals”
> spouting off about VN being a class or race war, you now are
> fore-warned and fore-armed.
>
>If you want a copy of my article, let me know, and I’ll e-mail it to
> you. I’m calling for my Cngrsmn to make a public retraction … and it
> is really hard-hitting … ethically. Among other things, I point
> out that one of my classmates killed in VN would undoubtedly be in
> his Congressional seat, if he hadn’t been killed in VN.
>
>Lou Coatney, mslrc@uxa.ecn.bgu.edu

Posted via email from mahan’s posterous

Purpose
The Mahan Naval Discussion List hosted here at NavalStrategy.org is to foster discussion and debate on the relevance of Admiral Alfred Thayer Mahan's ideas on the importance of sea power influenced navies around the world.
Links