[Fwd: Re: Naval Warfare (was Japanese names)]
January 2nd, 2009Date: Thu, 07 Aug 1997 07:51:35 -0700
>From: Tracy Johnson
>Reply-To: tjohnson@adnetsol.com
>Organization: adnetsol.com
>X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (Win95; I)
>To: mahan@microworks.net, mike.potter@artecon.com
>CC: tjohnson@adnetsol.com
>Subject: [Fwd: Re: Naval Warfare (was Japanese names)]
>Precendence: bulk
>Sender: mahan-owner@microworks.net
>Resent-From:
>Resent-Date: Thu, 7 Aug 97 08:16:18 EST
>Resent-To: dave@openlines.com
>X-Status:
>
>An interesting conversation from the CONSIM-L list.
>–
>Tracy Johnson
>tjohnson@adnetsol.com
>”Semper Pollus”
> ADC-2239-5531
>Received: from listserv.uni-c.dk (listserv.uni-c.dk [130.228.3.7]) >by adnetsol.adnetsol.com (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id DAA11061 for >
>Received: from listserv (listserv.uni-c.dk [130.228.3.7]) by >listserv.uni-c.dk (8.7.1/8.6) with SMTP id MAA11378; Thu, 7 Aug 1997 >12:25:15 +0200
>Received: from LISTSERV.UNI-C.DK by LISTSERV.UNI-C.DK (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release
> 1.8b) with spool id 5919 for CONSIM-L@LISTSERV.UNI-C.DK; Thu, 7 Aug
> 1997 12:25:14 +0200
>Received: from cap1.CapAccess.org (trooker@cap1.CapAccess.org [207.91.115.50])
> by listserv.uni-c.dk (8.7.1/8.6) with SMTP id MAA36964 for
>
>Received: (from trooker@localhost) by cap1.CapAccess.org (8.6.12/8.6.10) id
> GAA10271; Thu, 7 Aug 1997 06:30:46 -0400
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
>Message-ID:
>Date: Thu, 7 Aug 1997 06:30:46 -0400
>Reply-To: Conflict simulation Games
>Sender: Conflict simulation Games
>From: Terry Rooker
>To: Multiple recipients of list CONSIM-L
>In-Reply-To: <33e9266a>
>
>On Wed, 6 Aug 1997, perrym wrote:
>
> > Most of that extra space we were talking about was in the hull. The
> > Navy was toying around with the MK 71 Lightweight 8″ gun. If you ever
> > saw it on the USS HULL (a FORREST SHERMAN DD) and then look at how much
> > room there is around the 5″ on a SPRUANCE, it doesn’t take much
> > imagination. If you’re going to have an 8″, you still need a magazine
> > with decent capacity. Anyway, at least one refit used that extra
> > space. As the vertical launch systems replaced the ASROC launchers, the
> > SPRU-cans became strike DDs with Tomahawk. Not part of the original
> > plan but it works.
> > >
>Sigh… The Spruance was designed to take advantage of several programs
>then under development. All of these where part of the original plan.
>the Spruance was designed to have 2 8″/72 mounts replacing the 5″/54s.
>Although some people claim that only one was intended. I had a friend
>who was a gunnery officer on a DD963 and he told me the figures comparing
>the magazine loadout of 5″ shells on his ship. Considering the
>difference in size of the 8″ and 5″ rounds I believed him when he said
>they were supposed to have 2 8″ guns. The ship was also designed for the
>VLS. It just wasn’t available when the original ships were built. That
>is also why the Shah got the Mk26 (?) luanchers for SAMs, it was the only
>thing ready at the time. The DD963 VLS was intended to carry more than
>THAWK though. The were vague intentions for a vertically launched ASROC,
>possibly a VL Harpoon, and some SAM. I think the intention for the
>latter was to have a multi-channel FCS that could be used to gunfire or
>to guide 1 or 2 missiles. Presumably this would have been some variation
>of the Standard missile. They only became Strike DDs when all the
>programs but THAWK lapsed.
>
>
> > You’re right about bigger hulls. That’s why the
> > ARLEIGH BURKE is so beamy.
>
>The beamy hull of the Burke class has little to do with future growth.
>The beamy hull was a deliberate design decision. There was an article in
>Proceddings as the program was just getting under way. Previous USN hull
>forms were optimized for efficient cruising, so they were long and
>narrow. The Soviets had consistently built ships that were much beamier,
>because there were some drag resistance benefits at high speeds.
>Ironically, if you look at some of the last Soviets designs they were
>moving towards the ‘cruising’ hull form, while the US with the Burke was
>moving towards the high speed hull form.
>
>Terry33e9266a>