Clintie gets it right

January 2nd, 2009

From Thu Sep 18 22:11:24 1997
>X-Errors-To:
>Date: Fri, 19 Sep 1997 01:10:52 -0400 (EDT)
>X-Sender: rickt@pop3.cris.com
>X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Version 1.4.4
>To: mahan@microwrks.com
>From: rickt@cris.com (Eric Bergerud)
>Subject: Clintie gets it right
>Precendence: bulk
>Sender: mahan-owner@microworks.net
>
>I know this is not specifically a naval issue, but regardless of personal
>opinions toward Mr. Bill, I think people should tip their hat because
>Clinton had the nerve to refuse to sign the anti-land mine bill. The
>countries that supported it, like Canada and most NATO countries, all have
>one thing in common: they know their armies have almost no chance of
>confronting combat in the forseeable future. The smaller nations, of course,
>would be protected by sugar daddy in any case. The countries that opposed
>it, (Russia, China, S Korea, Japan, Iraq, Iran and Isreal) all have one
>thing in common: they can imagine a real shooting war very close to their
>borders breaking out at any time. Whether it’s for good or ill, the US is in
>the second group and not the first. To dispense with a weapon as useful as
>anti-personnel mines would have been military folly and just the sort of
>thing that Clinton’s allies on the left eat with a spoon.
>Eric Bergerud, 531 Kains Ave, Albany CA 94706, 510-525-0930

Posted via email from mahan’s posterous

Purpose
The Mahan Naval Discussion List hosted here at NavalStrategy.org is to foster discussion and debate on the relevance of Admiral Alfred Thayer Mahan's ideas on the importance of sea power influenced navies around the world.
Links